Well you know what Mr Smart Pants? I had it the proper way, and then when I did the spellcheck, it came up as being spelt wrong, and had 'commenter's' as the alternative. So I pressed it. Blame stoopid spellcheck, not me.
And yes, if Spellcheck jumped off a cliff I would too.
He doesn't want to frighten the pale, freshly de-lurked creture. He must stand very still and offer it some food from an open palm, and build up trust. Otherwise it will bolt.
@Nathan: I read a fair few of your posts, but I'm hesitant to add such a prolific poster to my RSS, as I already have more to read than I really have time for.
I tend to use st-eutychus as a buffet to feed on once I've exhausted my reader.
And yes, I should post more on mine - I have plenty of ideas, but lack motivation. One day there will be more there. You should watch the two videos that I linked yesterday. They are worth watching.
No. Well, you are I guess, but not the one I was talking about, and not any more because you linked to me which is, in terms of blogger parlance, more effective delurking than commenting.
--- I'm not afraid of frequent updates per se, it just appears that you post around 50 or 60 times a day, and I'm worried about my productivity at work :)
I'll upgrade you to the hallowed status of appearing in Rodeo's RSS Reader eventually I'm sure :)
16 comments:
Well you know what Mr Smart Pants? I had it the proper way, and then when I did the spellcheck, it came up as being spelt wrong, and had 'commenter's' as the alternative. So I pressed it. Blame stoopid spellcheck, not me.
And yes, if Spellcheck jumped off a cliff I would too.
I have delurked one reader. Let there be more of it I say...
Who, me?
I've been hanging around here for month!
i think he's bragging about someone on his own blog, Rodeo.
Then why wouldn't he post it on his own blog then?
;)
He doesn't want to frighten the pale, freshly de-lurked creture. He must stand very still and offer it some food from an open palm, and build up trust. Otherwise it will bolt.
Fair enough - they could be out of there in 9.58 seconds!
Do you lurk on mine too RodeoClown? You should. You should also post more on yours.
I was referring to another lurker.
Usain Bolt reading my blog. Now that would be a triumph.
@Nathan: I read a fair few of your posts, but I'm hesitant to add such a prolific poster to my RSS, as I already have more to read than I really have time for.
I tend to use st-eutychus as a buffet to feed on once I've exhausted my reader.
And yes, I should post more on mine - I have plenty of ideas, but lack motivation. One day there will be more there. You should watch the two videos that I linked yesterday. They are worth watching.
Another lurker bites the dust.
One day I will use that quote as a testimonial.
I just read your terrific post that you linked to from the Fountainside today. Much respect.
Am I the lurker? I don't like the word lurker. I prefer casual observer...
No. Well, you are I guess, but not the one I was talking about, and not any more because you linked to me which is, in terms of blogger parlance, more effective delurking than commenting.
Three delurkings in one day. I'm on a roll.
I'm now wondering how many people out there share RodeoClown's fear of constant updates.
I think I will conduct a poll.
@Nathan: Thanks, I meant what I said there.
---
I'm not afraid of frequent updates per se, it just appears that you post around 50 or 60 times a day, and I'm worried about my productivity at work :)
I'll upgrade you to the hallowed status of appearing in Rodeo's RSS Reader eventually I'm sure :)
Just not today :D
I picture Nathan in full de-lurking regalia, looking sort of like a Ghost Buster.
Post a Comment